From vibe code
to product.

No – in fact we're often more affordable than expected, and our pricing is transparent from the very first glance at the homepage. People who think we're expensive are usually comparing the wrong thing: an offer that doesn't include security, compliance and production-readiness at all, or fast AI code that you pay for a second time later to fix. Measured against what a reliably running system actually costs, we're rarely the expensive option – we're the one you don't pay for twice. Tell us in the initial call what you're comparing against, and we'll show you openly where the difference lies.

Absolutely – and we encourage it. We use Claude Code ourselves, every day. AI gets you to a working demo in days, but not to production. The hard 80% comes afterwards: security, an architecture that scales under load, data protection, testing, deployment, and the liability when something fails. According to Veracode (GenAI Code Security Report, 2025), 45% of AI-generated code contains security vulnerabilities – AI produces plausible code, but no judgment about which shortcut becomes tomorrow's breach. We're not the alternative to AI; we're the engineering layer that turns AI output into a system you can take live responsibly.

Yes. In a free initial consultation we analyse your existing codebase. We keep what works, identify security gaps and architectural debt, and build a production-ready system around your validated concept. We never discard working code unnecessarily.

A lot can be deferred – but not everything. You don't need perfect architecture from day one; that just burns budget before the market has validated your product. But a foundation that can't bear load fails exactly when you succeed – at the first real surge, when new features suddenly take twice as long. A full rebuild then typically costs months, not weeks. So we harden now what has to survive the first surge, and deliberately defer the rest – you're not choosing between fast-and-cheap now and clean-someday.

The real question isn't which tool, but: rent or own? Builders like Webflow create dependency – you rent your product, you're bound to their prices, limits and continued existence, and you never own the platform, the opposite of digital sovereignty. We don't use WordPress at all, not even for simple sites: the plugin, update and security treadmill is permanent effort and attack surface. And it isn't even a speed argument – with AI-assisted development (Claude Code plus design tooling) we build faster and more efficiently than a WordPress setup, and the result belongs to you, with no lock-in.

That's understandable – and exactly why we suggest an honest question. The money already spent is gone no matter what you decide; it shouldn't steer the next decision. The real question is: if you started from scratch today, with everything you now know – would you build it the same way? The answer to that protects the next euro, not the last one. So you don't have to decide blind, our platform assessment is free: you get a clear evaluation and a concrete offer before you commit. And we deliver as one coherent whole rather than patchwork – because half-finished is usually exactly what cost the money before.

Because 'everyone does it' is neither a security nor a legal strategy. US cloud providers are subject to the CLOUD Act, which lets US authorities access your data – regardless of where it is physically stored. Even AWS Frankfurt doesn't make your data sovereign. EU-owned providers like Hetzner offer native GDPR compliance, zero CLOUD Act exposure, and are roughly 2–10× cheaper at comparable configurations (Hetzner vs. AWS, as of June 2026).

When the only goal is to put something up fast – without a minimum standard of quality, security and compliance. We could technically cut those corners, but then quality can't be retrofitted later, and that harms both sides. If your priority is 'as cheap and fast as possible', another provider is a better fit – and we'll tell you that openly in the initial call. We work with companies that see their platform as a foundation, not a throwaway product.

We provide strategic technical leadership, not just development hours. Every engagement is carried by a dedicated senior team covering strategy, project steering, engineering and long-term operation. We specialise exclusively in turning AI prototypes into production-ready, EU-sovereign platforms – that's all we do.

We primarily serve SMEs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, but we work with any European company that values digital sovereignty and engineering quality. We communicate in both German and English.